From owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org  Tue Jun  9 15:58:56 1998
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by jaz.jp.freebsd.org (8.8.8+3.0Wbeta13/8.7.3) id PAA07395;
	Tue, 9 Jun 1998 15:58:56 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from sraigw.sra.co.jp (sraigw.sra.co.jp [202.32.10.2])
	by jaz.jp.freebsd.org (8.8.8+3.0Wbeta13/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA07390
	for <tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 15:58:53 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from furuta@sra.co.jp)
Received: from sranhc.sra.co.jp (sranhc [133.137.20.3])
	by sraigw.sra.co.jp (8.8.7/3.6Wbeta7-sraigw) with ESMTP id PAA07157;
	Tue, 9 Jun 1998 15:57:39 +0900 (JST)
Received: from sras63.sra.co.jp (root@sras63 [133.137.20.191])
	by sranhc.sra.co.jp (8.8.7/3.6Wbeta7-srambox) with SMTP id PAA17641;
	Tue, 9 Jun 1998 15:57:53 +0859 (JST)
Received: from sras63.sra.co.jp (furuta@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sras63.sra.co.jp (8.6.12+2.4W3/3.4W-sras63) with ESMTP id PAA27116; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 15:57:52 +0900
Message-Id: <199806090657.PAA27116@sras63.sra.co.jp>
To: mike@smith.net.au
Cc: itojun@itojun.org, core@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org,
        tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 08 Jun 1998 21:14:10 -0700"
References: <199806090414.VAA00467@antipodes.cdrom.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.70 on Emacs 19.28.7 / Mule 2.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 1998 15:57:46 +0900
From: Atsushi Furuta <furuta@sra.co.jp>
Reply-To: FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Distribute: distribute [version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel=24]
X-Sequence: FreeBSD-tech-jp 1505
Subject: [FreeBSD-tech-jp 1505] Re: new config 
Errors-To: owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org
Sender: owner-FreeBSD-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org

>> In article <199806090414.VAA00467@antipodes.cdrom.com>,
	Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> writes:

> Newconfig imposes very strict hierarchical structure on the system, and 
> whilst well-geared towards a static configuration, is much less well 
> suited to dynamic operation (my evaluation only).  Bearing in mind that 
> it has been at least a year since I had anything to do with newconfig, 
> I'd be interested in more clarification.

  Please tell me your definition of "static/dynamic configuration" in
this context.

My understanding:

	static configuration -> to give parameters in compile time
	dynamic configuration -> to give parameters in boot time

Is this correct?
--
furuta@sra.co.jp (Atsushi Furuta)
   Advanced Technology Group.  Software Research Associates, Inc.
